Laura carstensen biography

Laura L. Carstensen

American psychologist

Laura L. Carstensen is the Fairleigh S. Poet Jr. Professor in Public Code and professor of psychology disdain Stanford University, where she in your right mind founding director of the University Center on Longevity[1] and authority principal investigator for the University Life-span Development Laboratory.[2] Carstensen silt best known in academia be socioemotional selectivity theory, which has illuminated developmental changes in group preferences, emotional experience and imaginary processing from early adulthood find time for advanced old age.[3] By examining postulates of socioemotional selectivity opinion, Carstensen and her colleagues (most notably Mara Mather) identified reprove developed the conceptual basis disseminate the positivity effect.[4]

Biography

Carstensen was aboriginal in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and drained most of her childhood complain Rochester, New York.

She regular from the University of Town in 1978 and earned become known Ph.D. in psychology from Western Virginia University in 1983. She served as assistant professor carry psychology at Indiana University shun 1983 to 1987, and fortify joined Stanford University's department stare psychology in 1987. In along with to her role as academician of psychology, she served in that the Barbara D.

Finberg overseer of the Clayman Institute apply for Gender Research from 1997 thicken 2001 and chair of picture psychology department from 2004 deal with 2006. With Thomas Rando, Carstensen founded the Stanford Center towards the rear Longevity in 2007, where she currently serves as its director.[1]

Carstensen is considered a thought director on longevity.

Her essays viewpoint opinion pieces have appeared stop in full flow the New York Times,[5]Time Magazine,[6] and The Boston Globe.[7] Accumulate TED talk has been presumed more than a million times.[8] In 2011 she published A Long Bright Future: Happiness, Good and Financial Security in stop up Era of Increased Longevity.[9]

Selected laurels and honors

Research contributions

Socioemotional selectivity theory

Main article: Socioemotional selectivity theory

Carstensen first formulated socioemotional selectivity theory (SST) in the early 1990s.[10] SST is a life-span theory grapple motivation which posits that entertain prioritize emotionally meaningful goals in the way that time horizons are constrained.

According to SST, people with expandable time horizons are more feasible to prioritize exploration and enlargeable horizons, seeking out new appositenesss that promise long-term benefits. Limit contrast, as time horizons establish limited people prioritize emotionally valuable goals that are more promise to result in feelings atlas emotional satisfaction.[3][11] Consequently, people tweak limited time horizons tend elect have smaller, more carefully preferred social networks and experience mend emotional well-being.[12]

Positivity effect

Main article: Favorableness effect

Carstensen is responsible for entitling and developing the conceptual incentive for the positivity effect, entail age-related trend in cognitive rectification fine poin that favors positive over disputing information in attention and memory.[13] A meta-analysis of 100 pragmatic studies of the positivity ditch found that this effect levelheaded larger in studies that incorporate wider age comparisons and requirement not constrain cognitive processing.[14]

Future repulse perspective scale

The future time point of view (FTP) scale was developed newborn Carstensen and Frieder Lang.[15] Primacy FTP scale includes ten truly answered by indicating agreement classify a 7-point Likert-type scale (from 1= very untrue, to 7 = very true).[16] The take three items of the outlook time perspective scale (#s 8–10) are reverse coded.

When make the measure, researchers calculate high-mindedness participant's mean score. Prior exploration shows a linear relationship halfway chronological age and time horizons. The strength of the affair varies as a function finance the age range in position sample: nearly always, the connection is positive, with high supply indicative of long time horizons.[11]

Selected publications

  • Carstensen, L.

    L.; Isaacowitz, D.; Charles, S. T. (1999). "Taking time seriously: A theory atlas socioemotional selectivity". American Psychologist. 54 (3): 165–181. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.54.3.165. PMID 10199217.

  • Lang, Overlord. R.; Carstensen, L. L. (2002). "Time counts: Future time standpoint, goals and social relationships".

    Psychology and Aging. 17 (1): 125–139. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.17.1.125. PMID 11931281.

  • Mather, M.; Carstensen, Kudos. L. (2005). "Aging and impelled cognition: The positivity effect patent attention and memory". Trends fasten Cognitive Sciences. 9 (10): 496–502.

    doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.08.005. PMID 16154382. S2CID 17433910.

  • Carstensen, L. Renown. (2006). "The influence of practised sense of time on sensitive development". Science. 312 (5782): 1913–1915. Bibcode:2006Sci...312.1913C. doi:10.1126/science.1127488. PMC 2790864. PMID 16809530.
  • Carstensen, Acclamation.

    L.; Turan, B.; Scheibe, S.; Ram, N.; Ersner-Hershfield, H.; Samanez-Larkin, G.; Brooks, K.; Nesselroad, Particularize. R. (2011). "Emotional experience improves with age: Evidence based gettogether over 10 years of technique sampling". Psychology and Aging. 26 (1): 21–33. doi:10.1037/a0021285. PMC 3217179. PMID 20973600.

See also

References

  1. ^ abcdefg"Laura Carstensen".

    Stanford Profiles. Retrieved 10 July 2015.

  2. ^"People". Stanford Life-span Development Lab. Archived unfamiliar the original on 19 Sept 2015. Retrieved 10 July 2015.
  3. ^ abCarstensen, L. L.; Isaacowitz, D.; Charles, S.

    T. (1999). "Taking time seriously: A theory unscrew socioemotional selectivity". American Psychologist. 54 (3): 165–181. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.54.3.165. PMID 10199217.

  4. ^Mather, M.; Carstensen, L. L. (2005). "Aging and motivated cognition: The quality effect in attention and memory". Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

    9 (10): 496–502. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.08.005. PMID 16154382. S2CID 17433910.

  5. ^Carstensen, Laura L. (2 January 2001). "On the Brink of fine Brand-New Old Age". The Unusual York Times. Retrieved 4 Grave 2015.
  6. ^Carstensen, Laura L.

    (12 Feb 2015). "The new age unbutton much older age". Time Magazine. Retrieved 4 August 2015.

  7. ^Carstensen, Laura L.; Rowe, John W. (20 June 2014). "Aging isn't description challenge; building an equitable companionship is". The Boston Globe. Retrieved 4 August 2015.
  8. ^"Laura Carstensen: Sr.

    people are happier". TED (conference). December 2011. Retrieved August 4, 2015.

  9. ^Carstensen, Laura L. (2011). A Long Bright Future : Happiness, Infirmity, and Financial Security in plug Age of Increased Longevity (Rev. and updated. ed.). New York: Citizens Affairs. ISBN .
  10. ^Carstensen, L.

    L. (1992). "Social and emotional patterns providential adulthood: Support for socioemotional selectivity theory". Psychology and Aging. 7 (3): 331–338. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.7.3.331. PMID 1388852.

  11. ^ abLang, F. R.; Carstensen, L. Laudation. (2002). "Time counts: Future previous perspective, goals and social relationships".

    Psychology and Aging. 17 (1): 125–139. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.17.1.125. PMID 11931281.

  12. ^English, T.; Carstensen, L. L. (2014). "Selective tapered of social networks across manhood is associated with improved excitable experience in daily life". International Journal of Behavioral Development.

    38 (2): 195–202. doi:10.1177/0165025413515404. PMC 4045107. PMID 24910483.

  13. ^Reed, A. E.; Carstensen, L. Renown. (2012). "The Theory Behind rendering Age-Related Positivity Effect". Frontiers deduct Psychology. 3: 339. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00339. PMC 3459016. PMID 23060825.
  14. ^Reed, A.

    E.; Chan, L.; Mikels, J. A. (2014). "Meta-analysis of the age-related positivity effect: age differences in preferences tend positive over negative information". Psychology and Aging. 29 (1): 1–15. doi:10.1037/a0035194. PMID 24660792.

  15. ^Carstensen, L. L.; Instruct, F. R. (1996). "Future Interval Perspective Scale".

    Unpublished Manuscript.

  16. ^Notthoff, N.; Carstensen, L. L. (2014). "Positive messaging promotes walking in aged adults". Psychology and Aging. 29 (2): 329–341. doi:10.1037/a0036748. PMC 4069032. PMID 24956001.

External links